In re Emrich’s Empirical Analysis
101 F. 231 · 1900
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1944
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sparhawk v. Yerkes · Hyde v. Woods · Mays v. Fritton · Adams's Appeal · In re Becker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whether she could thus be brought in by rule, and her claim determined by this means, if objected to, is a question not now before us, and upon which we express no opinion. Suffice it to say, she has submitted herself to the jurisdiction of the court, has invited its action upon her rights, and, having taken the chance of a favorable decision of the referee, she cannot now, for the first time, complain of lack of jurisdiction when the decision is adverse. Mays v. Fritton, 20 Wall. 418 , 22 L. Ed. 389 ; Adams’ Appeal, 113 Pa. 454 , 6 Atl. 100 ; Edgett v. Douglass, 114 Pa. 100 , 22 Atl. 868 , 12 Enc. Pl. & Prac. 191.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Matthews
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.