In re Hoadley’s Empirical Analysis
101 F. 233 · 1900
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 1930
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1930
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Forsyth v. City of Hammond · Detroit v. Osborne · Leffingwell v. Warren · 1 E.H. Smith 348 - Baer v. Hendricks · Moore v. Littel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.