In re Russell’s Empirical Analysis
101 F. 248 · 1900
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 1932 · most notably Houghton v. Burden (1913), Vass v. Conron Bros. (1932)
12 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Claflin v. Houseman · Freeman v. Howe · Insurance Company v. Boon · Eyster v. Gaff · Dietzsch v. Huidekoper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““AVe should entertain no doubt that the Machinists’ Supply Company was entitled to bring an action of trespass or trover for the recovery of the value of the property against the trustee In the state court.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.