Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 F.1d 645 - Nash v. Ingalls

Nash v. Ingalls’s Empirical Analysis

101 F. 645 · 1900

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
October 1912
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Wood v. Carpenter · Badger v. Badger · Godden v. Kimmell · Foster v. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railroad · Lansdale v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The law requires that, in order to relieve himself from the consequence of delay in seeking a remedy for a wrong, the party should have given reasonable attention to his own affairs, and he is chargeable with knowledge of such facts as such reasonable attention would have afforded him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.