Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 F.2d 242 - Webb v. Lohnes

Webb v. Lohnes’s Empirical Analysis

101 F.2d 242 · 1938

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2010

3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

40193819401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Josephine Throckmorton v. Washington Holt · In Re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Kennedy · Collyer v. . Collyer · Jackson v. Hewlett · Thomas v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If a will or codicil, known to have been in existence during testator's lifetime, and in his custody, or where he had ready access to it, can not be found at his death, a presumption arises that such will was destroyed by testator in his lifetime with the intention of revoking it; and in the absence of rebutting evidence this presumption is sufficient to justify a finding that the will was revoked."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “witness claim[ed] to have seen the will or heard any statement from [decedent] that it was still in existence,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “evidence [demonstrated] continuing interest and friendly relationship between the [decedent and beneficiary].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.