Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 F.2d 40 - Curtis v. Helvering

Curtis v. Helvering’s Empirical Analysis

101 F.2d 40 · 1939

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
May 1994
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1994

3 federal appellate ·

301939194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Helvering v. Rankin · Davidson v. Commissioner · Miller v. Commissioner · Kraus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . splits, share dividends, and rights, would all have been easily traceable to the original shares out of which they came, and while it would have been somewhat difficult to allocate the original cost of a share among its progeny, there is nothing impossible in it; indeed, it is done every day in tax returns.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “identification is satisfied, if the margin trader has, through his broker, designated the securities to be sold as those purchased on a particular date and at a particular price.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.