Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 F.2d 676 - Booth v. Fletcher

Booth v. Fletcher’s Empirical Analysis

101 F.2d 676 · 1938

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

53 federal appellate · 30 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably Barr v. Matteo (1959), Pennsylvania Railroad v. Day (1959)

53 federal appellate · 30 district · 10 state decisions

3101938194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 306

Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Gibbons v. Ogden · Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · United States v. Lee · United States v. Throckmorton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[T]he presumption is that an attorney at law who appears in regular manner on behalf of a party litigant has authority to do so . . . .'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A court may take judicial notice of, and give effect to, its own records in another but interrelated proceeding....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The authority of the court over its attorneys and counsellors is of the highest importance. They constitute a profession essential to society. Their aid is required not merely to represent suitors before the courts, but in the more difficult transactions of private life. The highest interests are placed in their hands, and confided to their management. The confidence which they receive and the responsibilities which they are obliged to assume demand not only ability of a high order, but the strictest integrity. The authority which the courts hold over them, and the qualifications required for their admission, are intended to secure those qualities.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.