Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 F.3d 287 - Briones v. Runyon

Briones v. Runyon’s Empirical Analysis

101 F.3d 287 · 1996

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Terry v. Ashcroft (2003), Lisa L. Fitzgerald v. William Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (2001)

21 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

580199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Brown v. General Services Administration · Spring Meadows Apartment Complex Ltd. Partnership v. Stallings · Van Zant v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines · Graham v. Rj Henderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he statutory requirement [of timely administrative exhaustion] is analogous to a statute of limitations and is, therefore, considered subject to waiver, estoppel, and equitable tolling.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) that his workplace was permeated with discriminatory intimidation that was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of his employment and (2) that a specific basis exists for imputing the conduct that created the hostile environment to the employer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Under Title VII, a litigant must exhaust available administrative remedies in a timely fashion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.