Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Schmoke’s Empirical Analysis
101 F.3d 325 · 1996
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2017
10 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc. · New York v. Ferber · Marks v. United States · Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“children deserve special solicitude in the First Amendment balance because they lack the ability to assess and analyze fully the information presented through commercial media”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“for further consideration in light of 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“more extensive than is necessary to serve that interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.