Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

101 F.3d 695

Docket No. 95-7795.

O'Neal v. Merkel

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Oct. 31, 1996. Decided Nov. 18, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-11-18

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Toney Tucker Enterprises Incorporated Hollis v. Chrysler Credit Corporation Toney Tucker Enterprises Incorporated Tucker S

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-11-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2016

1 district ·

90199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Terence Kenneth O'Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Mark John Pletzke, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. O'Neal v. Merkel, No. CA-94-476-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/101/f3d/695 · .json · Public domain