Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 F.3d 95 - Felker v. Turpin

Felker v. Turpin’s Empirical Analysis

101 F.3d 95 · 1996

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably Felker v. Turpin (1996), Burris v. Parke (1997)

21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

170199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Jones v. Howard · Great State Beverages, Inc. v. Wenners · Lister v. United States · Kemmler · Lonchar v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e treat Plaintiffs' § 1983... claim as the functional equivalent of a second habeas petition, and apply the rules regulating second or successive habeas petitions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[p]laintiff's § 1983 claim is subject to the procedural requirements for bringing a second or successive habeas claim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.