Nickles v. O'Malley

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-06-29

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2004

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion · Decided 2004-06-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Clifton Nickles appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nickles v. O’Malley, No. CA-04-105-CCB (D. Md.) (Jan. 21, 2004; Feb. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED