Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 FRD 355 - Farnsworth v. Procter & Gamble Co.

Farnsworth v. Procter & Gamble Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
July 1996
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dow Chemical Co. v. Allen · Richards of Rockford, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. · Andrews v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “tampons with TSS, P & G served the Center with a subpoena seeking to discover the names and addresses of women who participated in the study. P & G hoped to discredit the Center study by pointing out certain purported”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.