Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 F.R.D. 743 - Morrison v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.

Morrison v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
September 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2010

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

301984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Foman v. Davis · Reiter v. Sonotone Corp. · 535 F. Supp. 1125 - Schaick v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc. · Neighborhood Development Corporation: v. Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Department of Housing and Urban Development City of Louisville O · Darms v. McCulloch Oil Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[h]ad Congress intended to create a federal treble damages remedy for cases involving bodily injury, injury to reputation, mental or emotional anguish, or the like, all of which will cause some financial loss, it could have enacted a statute referring to injury generally, without any restrictive language.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.