Leeds v. Rossell’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 1985
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch · Elder v. Brannan · 91 F. Supp. 108 - Reeber v. Rossell · 80 F. Supp. 652 - Fischer v. Haeberle · Ashley v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the case heavily relied on by plaintiffs, Reeber v. Rossell, D.C., 91 F.Supp. 108 , in which a preliminary injunction was granted notwithstanding there were administrative appeals pending, it does not appear that any substantial question of fact was involved and the court found that the undisputed facts established a violation of plaintiff’s rights.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Group v. Finletter““* * * they can bring án action for reinstatement in the District Court for the District of Columbia which has power to grant mandamus, and the Court of Claims can determine all damage the plaintiff sustained by reason of any wrongful removal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.