Berthold Types Ltd. v. Adobe Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on 185 Ill. 2d 457 - Air Safety, Inc. v. Teachers Realty Corp. · Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & Co. · Capitol Converting Equipment, Inc. v. LEP Transport, Inc. · Bourke v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp. · 139 Ill. App. 3d 313 - Tague v. Molitor Motor Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if it is unwitting and innocent, and Berthold does not say that it was not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.