State v. Shinyama’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2023
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 110 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Kitchen · State v. Timley · State v. Arceo · State v. Jenkins · Coon v. City and County of Honolulu
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"We may recognize plain error when the error committed affects substantial rights of the defendant." State v. Cullen, 86 Hawai'i 1, 8 , 946 P.2d 955, 962 (1997) (citations and internal quotation signals omitted). See also Hawai'i Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) Rule 52(b) (1993) ("Plain error or defects affecting substantial rights may be noticed although they were not brought to the attention of the court.").”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kamana'o · In Re Nc“[i]n “multiple act” cases, the defendant’s constitutional right to a unanimous jury verdict guaranteed under [a]rticle I, [sections] 5 and 14 of the Hawaii Constitution require that the jury be unanimous as to which act or incident constituted the erime[:] In a multiple acts case, ... several acts are alleged and any one of them could constitute the crime charged. In these cases, the jury must be unanimous as to which act or incident constituted the crime. To ensure jury unanimity in multiple acts cases, we require that either the State elect the particular criminal act upon which it will rely for conviction, or that the trial court instruct the jury [sic] that all of them must agree that the same underlying criminal act has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Stenger“[i]n an alternative means case, where a single offense may be committed in more than one way, there must be jury unanimity as to guilt for the single crime charged. Unanimity is not required, however, as to the means by which the crime was committed so long as substantial evidence supports each alternative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Whitaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.