Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 ILL 325 - Dulaney v. Payne

Dulaney v. Payne’s Empirical Analysis

1882

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
6
states following
February 1971
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 1971

14 state decisions

501882189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Secor v. . Sturgis · Phillips v. Bericic · Nickerson v. Rockwell · Walker v. Kimball

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * The contract thus assumes a very simple form: `I promise to pay the debt in one year; but if I do not, I will pay the interest at that time, and so at the end of each and every year until the debt is paid.' Being a promise to pay the debt at one time, and, contingently, to pay the interest at another or some other times, it must be construed as containing distinct promises, giving several causes of action; and these being several in their origin, no subsequent event can make them one and entire. * * *"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.