101 Ill. App. 3d 614 - People v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 1994
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Holloway v. Arkansas · 68 Ill. 2d 149 - People v. Perruquet · 74 Ill. 2d 286 - People v. Berland · 74 Ill. 2d 329 - People v. Vriner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[A]ppellate representation does not involve to the same extent the risk attending trial representation that confidential communications will be abused or that divided loyalty will interfere with an attorney’s ability to develop a favorable trial record. (See Holloway v. Arkansas (1978), 435 U.S. 475 , 55 L. Ed. 2d 426 , 98 S. Ct. 1173 .) We believe these critical distinctions dictate that a standard less rigorous than the one applied to conflict of interest in trial representation ought to be applied in determining whether an assistant appellate defender is confronted with a conflict of interest as the result of action taken by another member of the appellate defender’s staff.” (People v. Rogers (1981), 101 Ill. App. 3d 614, 617 , 428 N.E.2d 547, 549 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Black
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.