Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

101 Ind. App. 456

199 N.E 602

Melvin v. Hamilton, Admr.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1936

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1936-02-06

Relies on State, Ex Rel. v. Hinds, Trustee · 87 Ind. App. 6 - Indiana Service Corp. v. Dailey, Admr. · 85 Ind. App. 49 - Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Summitville Drain Tile Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1936-02-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1974

5 state decisions

2019361940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Wood, J.

¶1 This is an attempted appeal from a judgment of the Franklin Circuit Court. The sole error assigned for reversal is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. The appellants have failed to set out a copy of their motion for a new trial or the substance thereof in their brief. The brief also fails to show that any time was given in which to file a bill of exceptions containing the evidence and proceedings of the trial court or that any bill of exceptions approved by such court was ever filed and made a part of the record. Thus no question is presented for our consideration. State ex rel. v. Hinds (1929), 200 Ind. 613, 165 N. E. 754; United Paperboard Co. v. Muncie, etc., Co. (1926), 84 Ind. App. 333, 151 N. E. 365; Indiana Service Corporation v. Daily (1928), 87 Ind. App. 6, 159 N. E. 767; Rule 21, Supreme and Appellate Courts.

¶2 The death of appellee having been suggested the judgment is affirmed as of date of submission.

/101/indapp/456 · .json · Public domain