Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 MICH 106 - Kearney v. Clutton

Kearney v. Clutton’s Empirical Analysis

1894

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
5
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2018

6 state decisions

201894190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spooner v. Holmes · Hoffman v. Carow · Koch v. Branch & Crookes · Frizzell v. Rundle & Co. · Calkins v. Lockwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and sells it, paying over the proceeds, less his commission, he is liable, although he has no knowledge of want of title in the party for whom he sells, and acts in good faith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an auctioneer receives and takes the property into his possession”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.