Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 MINN 271 - Bilsborrow v. Pierce

Bilsborrow v. Pierce’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
June 1944
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 1944

12 state decisions

7019071910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stone v. Little Yellow Drainage District · Whittaker v. Stangvick · Minnesota Sugar Co. v. Iverson · Stees v. Kranz · Township of Swan Creek v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * The relaxation of the rule requiring a prima facie case of irreparable damage as a condition of granting an injunction in such a case as this, and a modification of the enforced standard of such damage obvious in such decisions generally, has been expressly recognized by this court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.