Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 NEB 748 - McCarter v. Lavery

McCarter v. Lavery’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
April 1983
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1983

7 state decisions

3019171920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mills v. Green · Heesch v. Snyder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Courts properly decline to express an opinion on a mere abstraction, and may act -on their .own motion in dismissing an appeal involving only an inquiry of that nature.” McCarter v. Lavery, 101 Neb. 748 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.