Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 NH 62 - State v. Ball

State v. Ball’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 1993
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1993

11 state decisions

5019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coffin v. United States · State v. Story · State v. Ellard · State v. Rousten · State v. Perkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is almost universally held that an indictment of an accessory to a crime does not require that the means and specific facts by which the alleged accessory procured, aided and abetted in the commission thereof be set forth. Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432 .... A defendant is not entitled in an indictment to information as to how the State is to prove its case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.