Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 N.M. 116 - Wolf and Klar Cos. v. Garner

Wolf and Klar Cos. v. Garner’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably Nearburg v. Yates Petroleum Corp. (1997), Garcia v. RODEY, DICKASON, SLOAN (1988)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions

2601984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Idaho · Leitensdorfer v. Webb · NM State Bd. of Ed. v. BD. OF ED., ETC. · New Mexico State Board of Education v. Board of Education of Alamogordo Public School District No. 1 · Independent Steel & Wire Co. v. New Mexico Cent. R.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The application of doctrines of “clean hands” or other such equitable defenses rests in the sound discretion of the trial court. Home Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Bates, 76 N.M. 660 , 417 P.2d 798 (1966). Absent a clear abuse of discretion, the trial court’s exercise thereof will not be disturbed on appeal. Flinchum Const. Co. v. Central Glass & Mirror Co., 94 N.M. 398 , 611 P.2d 221 (1980). Since it cannot be said that the court exceeded the bounds of reason, all circumstances before it being considered, Independent Steel & Wire Co. v. New Mexico Cent. R.R. Co., 25 N.M. 160 , 178 P. 842 (1919), we do not find an abuse of discretion....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “acts contrary to public policy, to sound morals, to the provisions of a statute, etc., however honest the intention with which they may have been performed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a breach of a legal or equitable duty, irrespective of the moral guilt of the fault-feasor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.