Swindle v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2001
2 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Green v. Advance Ross Electronics Corp. · Blount Ex Rel. Dearholt v. T D Publishing Corp. · Telephonic, Inc. v. Rosenblum · Tarango v. Pastrana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To satisfy constitutional due process requirements in applying this theory, we must find that [defendant] has purposely availed itself of the privilege of conducting activities in New Mexico. [Citation omitted.] For example, we might apply this theory if [defendant] itself had sold a defective product in a nationwide market. That is not the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.