Hooper v. Bernalillo County Assessor’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Shapiro v. Thompson · Dunn v. Blumstein · Regan v. Taxation With Representation of Washington · Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County · Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Hooper points out that the statute is unclear as to whether the requirement at issue is a continuous residency requirement and that a veteran with only one day of New Mexico residency, immediately followed by an extended period of nonresidency prior to May 8, 1976, might qualify for the exemption where Alvin D. Hooper does not. "Such arguments are not, standing alone, sufficient to allow this court to consider the issues raised. The exemption was not denied on either ground raised in support of this position. Hooper does not have standing to challenge the statute on the due process grounds of vagueness raised, and we decline to issue an advisory opinion on the matter. Advance Loan Co. v. Kovach, 79 N.M. 509, 445 P.2d 386 (1968); Asplund v. Alarid, 29 N.M. 129, 219 P. 786 (1923).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] state's interest in expressing gratitude and rewarding its own citizens for honorable military service is a rational basis for veterans' preferences,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“entitled to limit the period of time within which [veterans] may choose to establish residency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.