Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 N.M. 408 - Trujillo v. Puro

Trujillo v. Puro’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
5
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably Chavez v. Manville Products Corp. (1989), Bourgeous v. Horizon Healthcare Corp. (1994)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 49 state decisions

2401984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on County of Los Angeles v. Chavez-Salido · Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. · 293 Pa. Super. 122 - Banyas v. Lower Bucks Hospital · Northern Pueblos Enterprises. v. Montgomery · Mantz v. Follingstad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plaintiff alleged defendant intentionally included false statements in plaintiff's hospital records; that defendant failed to note in his office records a telephone call received from plaintiff; and that defendant testified falsely, denying receipt of the telephone call. Although the alleged false swearing before the medical review commission by defendant cannot subject defendant to civil liability (NMSA 1978, § 41-5-20(E) (Repl.Pamp.1982)), plaintiffs allegation of defendant’s false and intentional entry in the hospital records is sufficient to preclude a motion to dismiss on this claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.