Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 N.M. 58 - State v. Padilla

State v. Padilla’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2007 · most notably State v. Lujan (1985), State v. Hill (2001)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 21 state decisions

90198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Vitale · State v. Manzanares · State v. Goodson · State v. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Court of Appeals opinion in Fugate concerning the necessary facts exception is ... proper and correct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.