Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 Ohio App. 316 - Seybold v. Pitz

101 Ohio App. 316 - Seybold v. Pitz’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2018

5 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

501955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “{¶ 68} We agree with MMS. Whether the materials furnished and work performed were necessary to properly complete the work in good faith and perform the contract, or merely an effort to extend the time for filing an affidavit for a lien”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The true test is whether the alleged repairs are a necessary part of the proper completion and performance of the work which the lien claimant undertook to do.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.