101 Ohio App. 3d 245 - In Re Christopher R.’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
53 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably 115 Ohio App. 3d 567 - In Re Beechler (1996), 119 Ohio App. 3d 52 - In Re Miller (1997)
53 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 62 Ohio App. 3d 720 - State v. Penrod
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. In re Woolridge, 9th Dist. No. 20680, 2002-Ohio-828 . This Court has held a juvenile may waive his or her right to counsel, but the trial court must make sufficient inquiry to determine whether the juvenile does so knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily, Kindred, supra at ¶ 20 ; Christner, supra at ¶ 20 , citations deleted. Some of the factors the court must review are the juvenile's age, emotional stability, mental capacity, and prior criminal experience. Id. {¶ 46} While the trial court need not strictly adhere to the procedures set forth in Juv.R. 29(D), it must substantially comply with the provisions. In re J.J., 9th Dist. No. 21386, 2004-Ohio-1429 , at ¶ 9; In re Stone (April 13, 2005), 5 th Dist. No. 04CA013 at ¶ 16. {¶ 47} "[T]he applicable standard for the trial court's acceptance of an admission is substantial compliance with the provisions of Juv.R. 29(D). . . .”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“The court may refuse to accept an admission and shall not accept an admission without addressing the party personally and determining both of the following:”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.