101 Ohio App. 3d 433 - State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2023
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 49 Ohio St. 2d 77 - State v. Lane · 94 Ohio App. 3d 203 - State v. Pirman · 76 Ohio App. 3d 775 - State v. Pecina · 84 Ohio App. 101 - State v. Curnutt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Recantation by a significant witness does not, as a matter of law, entitle the defendant to a new trial. This determination is left to the sound discretion of the trial court.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“for accepting Slaughter's recantation over his trial testimony. Certainly, courts have held that where a defendant seeks a new trial based upon the recanted testimony of a witness, the court is *Page 5 called upon to determine the credibility of that witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.