101 Ohio App. 3d 514 - Wray v. Parsson’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2020
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schade v. Carnegie Body Co. · Pang v. Minch · 48 Ohio App. 3d 313 - Volodkevich v. Volodkevich · 155 Ohio St. 454 - Sowers v. Schaeffer · 16 Ohio App. 3d 411 - City of Norwood v. Forest Converting Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ppellant also has the responsibility of providing the reviewing court with a record of the facts, testimony, and evidentiary matters which are necessary to support *Page 10 the appellant's assignments of error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is fundamental that the appellant bears the burden of affirmatively demonstrating error on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.