Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 Okla. 128 - Bynum v. Moore

Bynum v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2021

10 state decisions

5019231930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daniel v. Tolon · Ross v. Morrow · Allison v. Crummey · Erwin v. Benton · Freeland v. Dolen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Section 4972. Minors except as otherwise provided by law are: First, males under 21 years of age. Second, females under 18 years of age. The periods thus specified must be calculated from the first minute of the day on which persons are born to the same minute of the corresponding day completing the period of minority.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is our opinion that the statute of this state changes the common law, and a minor becomes of full age on the first minute of the anniversary of his birth. * * *"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.