Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 Okla. 248 - Perry v. Shaver

Perry v. Shaver’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1952
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wimberly v. Winstock · Farmers' State Bank of Ada v. Keen · Nowka v. West · Turben v. Douglass · Oklahoma Nat. Bank v. Cobb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The husband did not take the witness stand. The wife, refusing to hazard .explanation of the voluminous testimony of prejudicial conduct of herself and her husband. stands here only on the coldly asserted insufficiency of the evidence against her. Refusing explanations as she did, her defense bears not the mark of honest battle. and this the court has often held to be material and most substantial proof against her. See 27 C. J. 803; Potts v. Rubesam, 54 Okla. 408 , 156 Pac. 356 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.