Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 P3D 422 - State v. McNutt

State v. McNutt’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · 122 Wash. 2d 1 - Matter of Personal Restraint of Young · In Re Detention of Thorell · In Re Albrecht · 140 Wash. 2d 686 - Detention of Henrickson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Recent overt act' means any act or threat that has either caused harm of a sexually violent nature or creates a reasonable apprehension of such harm in the mind of an objective person who knows of the history and mental condition of the person engaging in the act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen, on the day a sexually violent predator petition is filed, an individual is incarcerated for a sexually violent offense, RCW 71.09.020[15], or for an act that would itself qualify as a recent overt act, RCW 71.09.020[10].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Although the act of communicating here involved a girl rather than boys, we conclude that it constitutes a recent overt act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.