State v. Reichenbach’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 106 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably State v. Grier (2011), State v. Brockob (2007)
1 federal appellate · 106 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) defense counsel's representation was deficient, i.e., it fell below an objective standard of reasonableness based on consideration of all the circumstances; and (2) defense counsel's deficient representation prejudiced the defendant, i.e., there is a reasonable probability that, except for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ashue · State v. Brockob“a criminal defendant can rebut the presumption of reasonable performance by demonstrating that `there is no conceivable legitimate tactic explaining counsel's performance.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Grier · State v. Statler“As a general rule, warrantless searches and seizures are per se unreasonable. However, there are a few `jealously and carefully drawn exceptions' to the warrant requirement, including consent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.