Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 SO2D 169 - Hohauser v. Schor

Hohauser v. Schor’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2005

9 state decisions

50195819601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 107 Cal. App. 97 - Klinger v. Modesto Fruit Co., Inc. · Collins v. Aetna Insurance · Craig v. Buckley · 50 Cal. App. 708 - Ewing v. Hayward · Murphy v. Hutchinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * when the issue of the agency relationship should be submitted to the jury for determination, then the plaintiff should be required to elect after verdict against which defendant he wishes to take judgment. See Klinger v. Modesto Fruit Co., supra [ 107 Cal. App. 97 , 290 P. 127, 128 ]; 2 Am.Jur. 320, Agency, § 409; Mechem, Outlines of Agency § 163 (1952).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.