Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 So. 2d 887 - Freeman v. State

101 So. 2d 887 - Freeman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 1978
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 1978

10 state decisions

60195819601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blackwell v. State · Lee v. State · Hulst v. State · Deiterle v. State · Gray v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The term `corpus delicti' connotes the body of the offense, or, otherwise stated, the substance of the crime. 26 Am.Jur., section 6, p. 159. As applied to homicide cases in the Florida jurisdiction, the corpus delicti consists of three essential ingredients: (1) the fact of death, (2) the existence of the criminal agency of another person as the cause of death, and (3) the identity of the deceased. Hulst v. State, 1936, 123 Fla. 315 , 166 So. 828 ; Deiterle v. State, 1931, 101 Fla. 79 , 134 So. 42 , and Lee v. State, 1928, 96 Fla. 59 , 117 So. 699 ."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.