101 So. 3d 1036 - George v. White’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 385 So. 2d 450 - JT Doiron, Inc. v. Lundin · 459 So. 2d 1273 - FRANK'S DOOR & BLDG. S., INC. v. Double H. Const. Co. · Martin Home Center, Inc. v. Stafford · 442 So. 2d 1383 - Andrus v. Bourque · 10 So. 3d 294 - Tompkins v. Savoie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the defendant made a false or misleading statement of a material fact or failed to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statement not misleading; (2) the plaintiff did not know of the untruth or omission; (3) the defendant knew, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could have known, of the untruth or omission.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.