101 So. 3d 1283 - Sanchez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 808 So. 2d 145 - Darling v. State · 573 So. 2d 330 - State v. Hawthorne · 425 So. 2d 1191 - Taylor v. State · 967 So. 2d 835 - State v. Sigler · 71 So. 3d 881 - Marrero v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, an owner, though presumed competent to testify to the value of stolen property, must demonstrate personal knowledge of the characteristics of the stolen property, such as the quality, cost, and condition of the property. The competence presumed of an owner is fragile, and where the owner shows a lack of familiarity with the stolen property, the opinion evidence will not support a determination of value. Second, the trial court must ascertain whether the State presented sufficient evidence to prove the value of the stolen property beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When the appellate court determines that the evidence does not prove the offense for which the defendant was found guilty but does establish guilt of a lesser statutory degree of the offense or a lesser offense necessarily included in the offense charged, the appellate court shall reverse the judgment and direct the trial court to enter judgment for the lesser degree of the offense or for the lesser included offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Masonett v. State“The owner also added that she had owned the items for a couple of months. The court held that the State failed to establish that the total market value of the stolen property exceeded $300, in part because of the phrasing of the question. Similarly, Adam Macomber's answer employed the word”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.