Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 SO3D 181 - Heimert v. Heimert

Heimert v. Heimert’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 639 So. 2d 921 - Ferguson v. Ferguson · Armstrong v. Armstrong · 824 So. 2d 623 - Sanderson v. Sanderson · 25 So. 3d 274 - Lowrey v. Lowrey · 626 So. 2d 140 - Daigle v. Daigle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a checklist to assist in the accuracy of their rulings ... [and to] reduce[ ] unintended errors that may affect the court's ultimate decision. The absence of an analysis of these factors and failure to apply the law to the facts at hand create error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Habitual cruel and inhuman treatment is conduct that either: (1) endangers life, limb, or health, or creates a reasonable apprehension of such danger and renders the relationship unsafe for the party seeking relief, or (2) is so unnatural and infamous as to render the marriage revolting to the non-offending spouse, making it impossible to carry out the duties of the marriage, therefore destroying the basis for its continuance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.