Gunn v. Ubbels’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 696 So. 2d 697 - Rosen v. Rosen · 78 So. 3d 696 - Crick v. Crick · Lovell v. Lovell · 679 So. 2d 837 - Stoler v. Stoler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard of review for an award or denial of attorney's fees in a dissolution of marriage proceeding is abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mattison v. Mattison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.