Reeves v. Hager’s Empirical Analysis
1899
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2016
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A probate of a will is a proceeding in rem, and operates upon the subject-matter in controversy, and, though, in common form, is binding upon all parties, whether adults or minors, until the probate is set aside by a proper proceeding, and in a proper manner. Under the rulings of our court, whatever may be the rule in other jurisdictions, in the absence of fraud or collusion, a probate in common form is conclusive, until annulled, both as to the capacity of the testator, and as to the testamentary character of the instrument and its due execution; and not even a court of chancery can inquire into these features, even though fraud and undue influence in procuring the will is alleged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“‘ ‘ The real question in the case is, whether the will of Mrs. Reeves, admitted to probate in common form, and remaining unattacked from 1879 to 1893, -will support a plea of innocent purchaser, in favor of a party who bought, in 1885, from the devisee under such will. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. Young““Upon its face, the provisions of the will are entirely natural * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Young v. Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.