Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 U.S. 306 - Ketchum v. St. Louis

Ketchum v. St. Louis’s Empirical Analysis

101 U.S. 306 · 1879

Citation profile

169
cited by 169 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 19 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 169 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2014 · most notably Walker v. Brown (1897), Martin v. National Surety Co. (1937)

56 federal appellate · 19 district · 34 state decisions — followed in 15 states

350187918801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Bank v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 169 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(3) Where a debtor, by an agreement with a creditor, sets apart a fixed portion of a specific fund in the hands, or to come into the hands, of another person, whom he directs to pay it to the creditor, the agreement is, when assented to by such person, an appropriation, binding upon the parties and all who, having notice, subsequently claim under the debtor an interest in the fund. “(4) A party may, by agreement, create a charge or claim in the nature of a lien on real as well as personal property whereof he is the owner or in possession, and the court of equity will enforce against him, and volunteers or claimants under him with notice of the agreement.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““But the accepted doctrine of courts of equity in respect to equitable liens or charges will he found, we think, to support the conclusion we have reached. The cases clearly establish this legal proposition. If a debtor, by a concluded agreement with a creditor, sets apart a specific amount of a specific fund in the hands, or to come into the hands, of another from a designated source, and directs such person to pay it to the creditor, which he assents to do, this is a specific appropriation, binding upon the parties and upon all persons with notice who subsequently claim an interest in the fund under the debtor.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““It is well settled that a party may, by express agreement, create a charge or claim in the nature of a lien on real as well as on personal property, of which he is the owner or in possession, and that equity will establish and enforce such charge or claim, not only against the party who stipulated to give it, but also against third persons, wlio> are either volunteers, or who take the estate on which the lien is agreed to be given with notice of the stipulation.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.