Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 U.S. 551 - Nougu v. Clapp

Nougu v. Clapp’s Empirical Analysis

101 U.S. 551 · 1879

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 1957
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1957 · most notably Marshall v. Holmes (1891), Simon v. Southern Railway Co. (1915)

27 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

210187918801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Randall v. Howard · National Bank v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The laws of Louisiana provide a remedy, by a special proceeding, to have a declaration of nullity of judgment in such cases as this in the court where the decree is entered. There is no allegation that the plaintiff pursued any of these remedies.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““This is a direct and positive interference with the original authority of the state court. If there was error in the proceedings of the court, a review can be had in the appellate tribunals of the state. If, as is charged, the decree is sought to be perverted and made the medium of consummating a wrong, then the court, on petition or supplemental bill, can prevent it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.