Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 VA 63 - Hudson v. Barham

Hudson v. Barham’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 1995
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1995

5 state decisions

201903191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rossett v. Fisher · Fidelity Loan & Trust Co. v. Dennis · Muller's Adm'r v. Stone · Shickel v. Berryville Land & Improvement Co. · Anderson v. Phlegar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “He may, and ought to, of his own motion, apply to a court of equity to remove impediments to a fair execution of his trust, to remove any cloud hanging over the title, and to adjust accounts, if necessary, in order to ascertain the actual debt which ought to be raised by the sale, or the amount of prior encumbrances. And he will be justified in delaying for these preliminary purposes the sale of the property until such resort may be had to a court of equity. If he shall fail to do this, the party injured by his default has an unquestionable right to do it — whether such party be the creditor secured by the deed of trust, or a subsequent encumberor, or the debtor himself, or his assignees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.