Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 101 Wash. 2d 355 - State v. Allen

101 Wash. 2d 355 - State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably 110 Wash. 2d 682 - State v. Scott (1988), State v. Pirtle (1995)

67 state decisions

28019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Screws v. United States · Fisher v. United States · 100 Wash. 2d 421 - Petersen v. State · 42 Wash. 2d 799 - State v. Emmanuel · 93 Wash. 2d 510 - State v. Shipp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is clear that the trial court must instruct the jury on every element of the crime.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If you find from the evidence that each of these elements has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then it will be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. On the other hand, if, after weighing all of the evidence, you have a reasonable doubt as to any one of these elements, then it will be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A person acts with intent or intentionally when he acts with the objective or purpose to accomplish a result which constitutes a crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.