101 Wash. App. 339 - Shellenbarger v. Brigman’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 98 Wash. 2d 434 - Wilson v. Steinbach · 112 Wash. 2d 216 - Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · 99 Wash. 2d 609 - Herskovits v. Group Health Cooperative · 97 Wash. 2d 929 - Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc. · 100 Wash. 2d 26 - Smith v. Shannon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“reviewed and considered ... the following:.... Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of court's Decision on Motion for Summary Judgment ( w/exhibits including Affidavit of Robert Schoene and Amended Supplemental Affidavit of Dr. Ganesh Raghu )”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in patients such as Mr. Shellenbarger, at the very least, the rate of progression of pulmonary fibrosis may be slowed if the disease is detected and treated at an early stage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“material dispute of fact as to whether [Drs. Brigman and Kirkpatrick] were negligent in their treatment of Mr. Shellenbarger.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.