State v. Kell’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2 Cal. 4th 792 - People v. Fauber · White v. United States · State v. Barnes · 72 Wash. 2d 565 - State v. Hawkins · 44 Wash. App. 290 - State v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[2] and all six jurors agreed the cell phone had not affected their verdict. The judge thanked the jury and released it. Kell then moved for a mistrial. She indicated she was not sure whether the jurors were”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kell“about their use of the cell phone, and that there could have been some”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kell“to take care of whatever responsibilities[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.